-
Vote With Your Feet
Read ☛: Vote With Your FeetThere is always a reason not to be involved: calendars are full, work is a drag, and you only get more tired with each passing year. But when we let these excuses get in our way, we are voting against the society we want to build.
-
Vote Every Day
Read ☛: Vote Every DayIf voting is so important, it would seem to be as, if not more, important to be regularly involved in one’s community. Imagine if you could vote every day! But there is no fervor for that.
-
End of an Era
Read ☛: End of an EraThis week’s elections thus brought a strange feeling over me: that this is the end of a bizarre 10-year era. It was like waking up from a very, very long and feverish dream.
-
Space Communism: the Final Frontier
Read ☛: Space Communism: the Final FrontierAs a Space Communist, I am pleased to see the Republicans got trounced. But remain vigilant Comrades! We must keep in mind that the GOP’s defeat was completely preventable.
-
-
Maybe Don’t Vote
Read ☛: Maybe Don’t VoteIt’s comforting to know you can guarantee votes for 98% of your Evil agenda, as long as your opponent can be represented as 99% Evil.
Recent Works
Continuing the Conversation
Editor
Children learn to form letters, phrase sentences, then to write paragraphs, then essays. In the same way, we have watched our community learn to say hello, to small talk, then to gather and bounce around ideas. But it mustn’t end there.
Read the Rest
The principles of neighborhood and subsistence will be disparaged by the globalists as ‘protectionism’ — and that is exactly what it is. It is a protectionism that is just and sound, because it protects local producers and is the best assurance of adequate supplies to local consumers. And the idea that local needs should be met first and only surpluses exported does not imply any prejudice against charity toward people in other places or trade with them. The principle of neighborhood at home always implies the principle of charity abroad. And the principle of subsistence is in fact the best guarantee of giveable or marketable surpluses. This kind of protection is not ‘isolationism.”
― Wendell Berry